I’ve been shortlisting for a new post today, as we’ve already received 43 applications for the advert I put up yesterday morning*. For a profession in which there is a narrative that prestigious Assistant Psychologist posts are almost impossible to get, the quality of applications is surprisingly poor. I don’t mean that the applicants themselves are surprisingly poor, as they seem to generally be alright, but the way they have applied for the post is, for far too large a proportion of those applying, pretty disappointing. It isn’t going to affect the outcome of the process, as there are some really good applications so we won’t have any trouble finding enough to interview, but there are far too many people who rule themselves out of the running unnecessarily. Many of these applicants might be quite good, but their applications fall far short of my shortlisting criteria for really obvious and easily avoidable reasons. That means that for people who do follow a few simple tricks** you greatly increase your chance of successful applications – not just in my post, but in any application within the field of psychology, and probably most of the advice will generalise to other job applications too.
Before you think that I’m a control freak with unreasonable expectations of applicants, please remember that the context is that 70+ candidates will apply for my vacancy before I close it, and NHS posts will typically attract 100-200 applicants within a short period of time, leading some to close in just a few hours. The balance of supply and demand here means that it’s a shortlister’s marketplace, and only the best applications from the best applicants will lead to an interview. That means that qualified CPs selecting for AP posts have to set high standards to let them narrow down the number of applicants quickly to a manageable amount that they can then shortlist in more detail. And having spoken to many other people who have been responsible for shortlisting similar posts and seen the posts on the thread on this topic on the clinpsy forum, my expectations and frustration with candidates who fail to do the simplest things to present their application properly are echoed by many of my peers.
Whilst these posts are particularly competitive and the application process has some sector-specific features, like the nature of GBC, and the relative values given to particular kinds of experience, what I am talking about are basic job seeking skills that should be taught by every career service or recruitment website. Not only that, but if you do a search on clinpsy you will see that the expectations held by people shortlisting for AP posts are clear, and there is a lot of advice available on this topic in the public domain. We are not expecting people to crack some secret code or have access to hidden insider information: Most of the things that would make the difference are things that require common sense and a bit of effort. My main grumble is as simple as people not reading the instructions on how to apply that are given in the job advert and firing off applications that aren’t specific to the post or don’t contain the required information, or that are really badly presented.
When it comes to my current post I’m not even asking anything too onerous. I haven’t set a task or asked anything unusual. I just want candidates to send a short CV and a covering letter saying how you fit the requirements of the post, with details of two referees. Surely that’s the minimum expectation when applying for a job, and pretty parallel to the NHSjobs expectation of giving education and employment history and then writing the supporting information and references? Yet a significant proportion have submitted applications with no covering letters, no references, or no information about why they want the job or are suited to it. To me that’s like going fishing but not taking a rod or a net.
In terms of essential criteria I’ve asked for a degree conferring GBC at 2:1 or better (or a degree level qualification in statistics or research), along with a driving license (or a transport plan for candidates with a disability to be able to complete the job). Yet many applicants have told me they will complete their undergraduate degree this summer, or don’t have a driving license. There are international applicants who haven’t shown me they can lawfully live and work in the UK. There are then applicants who haven’t given me information I need in order to see they meet my essential requirements. Perhaps they qualified abroad or with joint honours and they haven’t told me that they have GBC. Several haven’t given me a degree grade. Others might tell me that they had a particular job, but not give the hours or the dates so I can’t see how much experience they gained.
The process has really taught me how NOT to apply for a job in psychology, and I thought that might be expertise worth sharing. If you follow the advice I’ve numbered below, you too can be confident that you will maximise your chance to not secure a post!
So my first set of tips on how not to apply for a job are:
- Apply for jobs where you don’t meet the essential criteria
- Do not read the instructions on how to apply
- Do not write a covering letter (or supporting information section) at all
- Do not specify your degree grade
- Do not mention if you have GBC, even if you have an atypical qualification
- Apply from abroad but don’t worry to mention that you have the right to live and work in the UK
- Don’t tell me whether posts were full time or part time or the dates when you worked there
The next issue is that many (and in fact probably most) applications don’t tell me why you want this particular job, or how you meet our person specification. They fire off information that tells about their experiences and skills, but does nothing to show how they meet our shortlisting criteria, which are spelled out in the person specification. Few have told me why they want this job in particular as opposed to any job with an AP title or a CP supervisor. Some tell me about their aspirations to gain a training place and/or to have a career in clinical psychology, but (whilst I am aware that the post is a good developmental opportunity and I’m happy to support the successful candidate to develop) I’m not recruiting someone to help them achieve their aspirations. I’m recruiting to get a job done within my team, and their aspirations don’t tell me why they will be better at that job than the other 30+ people who have similar aspirations.
A significant proportion of applications consist of just a CV, perhaps with a very brief generic covering note. Many look like a mass mailing that the candidate sends out to every job listing that contains particular keywords. The result is that they feel like someone reading me a script to try and sell me double glazing or PPI claims without knowing anything about me – they have invested minimum effort but hope that if they apply to enough posts one might bite. In fact, many applications feel like they’ve taken less time to send out than they would take for me to read, and the impression given to the short-lister is that the person doesn’t care about the post at all.
Maybe it’s something about the internet age that people expect to be able to apply for a post with just a couple of clicks, like putting an item on an online store into their basket and then clicking to check out. If you had to invest the effort in phoning up for an application form and then filling it in by hand, as you did when I applied for my AP post in 1995, it might seem more obvious that you needed to make that effort count. But even then not every candidate would explain why they wanted the post. However the internet age also makes it easier to cut and paste the right chunks of information or to edit existing text. So it also makes it easier to tailor an application to a specific post.
So my next set of tips on how not to apply for a post are:
- Don’t read the job advert – the job title, pay and location are all the information you need
- Fire off a generic CV with no information about why you want the post or how your skills are suited to it (for bonus marks express interest in a different client group or service)
- Don’t even worry to read the person specification, that’s not important
- Don’t tailor your application to the job, just send the same application out to every post, regardless of the context or population.
The other big advantage is that the internet lets you check spelling and even grammar, so you really don’t need to submit applications that are peppered with typos and spelling mistakes. If you are dyslexic, get someone else to check it before submitting. If you feel too much time pressure to delay individual applications for proofreading then prepare the content you will need to configure most applications in advance so you can get someone to proofread your main blocks of text in advance. Word processing software also lets you count the number of characters, words and pages before you paste content in to your application, so you can easily follow any specified requirements. Which is why it is so puzzling to get six page CVs when I set a limit of two.
There are then other issues with how people present their applications. I get that pasting a CV into a recruitment site can mess with the formating, but you can normally use a preview feature to get the chance to see how it will appear to a recruiter, so it is worth checking. Simplify layouts and fonts and remove massive gaps that appear so that the CV looks neat and tidy. Keep it as short as possible. If I can write my CV on two pages, having worked in psychology for 24 years, managed teams in the NHS and now running my own business, I’m pretty sure that you don’t need six pages by the age of 23. And I’m sorry to break it to you, but I don’t care what your responsibilities were when you worked in that shop, or pub, or holiday resort in the summer before your degree. If you really want to mention it, I’m fairly sure one line would cover it. Otherwise it looks like you can’t prioritise – which is off-putting because being able to pick out the most salient information is an essential skill when deciding what information needs to go into a report.
So my next set of tips on how not to apply for a post are:
- Make lots of typos, and ensure to include as many spelling mistakes, punctuation errors and examples of poor grammar as possible (for bonus points, you could spell the name of the organisation or short-lister wrong, or try some text-style abbreviations)
- Lay your CV or application out so it is as unintelligible as possible, and definitely don’t check how it will appear in the application system
- Don’t worry about any requirements with regard to length, more is always better
- Put in lots of information about irrelevant experiences, such as work in retail and hospitality
I hope this blog doesn’t seem like I’m putting people who are just starting out in their psychology career down, or criticising those who have applied in a hurry for fear of the post closing before they have time to submit anything at all. My goal is entirely more positive – to share how simple it can be to make that impossible aspiration of gaining interviews for AP posts come true. There are certain really simple behavioural changes that can remarkably increase your odds of success.
So what can I do to improve my chances of gaining an interview?
First, apply to non-NHS job vacancies. It takes a little more effort to find them, and the quality can be more variable. However, they are a great foot in the door, and much easier to secure than their NHS equivalents as they tend to have lower numbers of applicants and to stay open a bit longer. If an NHS AP post means you have a 1 in 50 chance of an interview, a post outside the NHS might increase your odds to 1 in 15 for a fairly popular post, or even 1 in 3 if the post is only advertised on a company’s website and social media and not on a major recruitment platform. Yup, that one simple trick** can increase your chances by a factor of five!
Second, follow the instructions. Read the advert carefully and do what they tell you to do. If they ask for a two page CV make sure that you send one the right length. A 600 word essay? Well worth the effort, as sending it will double your chance of success compared to applying to a post without this requirement, as fewer other applicants will make the effort, whilst sending an application without it is posting your application straight into the no pile.
Third, tailor every application to show how you meet the person specification for that particular job, and to show you understand and are enthused about what the job will involve. Ideally you need to respond to every point of the person spec in a way that is clear and obvious to the shortlister, and probably in a similar order to that used in the specification. If they want a 2:1 or higher that confers GBC then you need to give your degree grade and specify it confers GBC, rather than assuming that the shortlister will know or be willing to check on Google whether this is the case. If you are applying from abroad or have international qualifications then it is worth stating whether you have the right to live and work in the UK, and explaining the scoring system and/or the UK equivalent of your degree grade.
Fourth, pick your battles. It is better to write fewer applications but to give each one more time so that it is of really good quality and tailored to the particular job than it is to send out hundreds of generic applications. Choose posts that you are enthusiastic about rather than applying to every AP post you see. Think about whether the location can work for you and whether you have relevant experience and/or transferable skills to bring. Make sure every application is up to the highest standards, even if this means they will sometimes close before you submit them***. In such a competitive field it is probably only worth applying for posts where you meet all the essential criteria.
Finally, check your working. Make sure you have spelt names and organisations correctly, and not made any silly typos or cutting and pasting errors. If you can, get someone else to read your text so you can get feedback on how to improve it. Even if that isn’t in time for the application you wrote it for, it will mean you don’t make the same mistakes next time. Preview the application to check the formatting if this is possible.
Then fire it off and cross your fingers!
*I’ll be reading more over the coming days too as we normally keep the advert open for a week or 75 applications, whichever comes first. Edited to add: We closed after 5 days and received a total of 86 applications. We invited five people to interview.
**cliche internet phrase
***In this circumstance it is worth sending an email to the appointing officer or point of contact given in the advert explaining what happened and attaching your application. They may consider it anyway, and even if they don’t you risk little by trying.
11 thoughts on “How not to apply for a job in psychology”
I feel like you’re asking for a lot of experience for 18,000 a year. That’s 3,000 below nhs afc Band 4 and doesn’t feel right at all.
The advert is for a post paying £18-24k in an area where you can rent a house for £450/month. Plenty of people choose to volunteer, or even to pay for experience through a postgraduate qualification. This is a paid post in an area with low cost of living, with an equivalent pay range from mid band 3 to bottom of band 5 in the NHS. So I’d suggest you save your judgement for posts asking for unpaid interns. There are plenty of people who think the quality of experience more than compensates for the relatively modest salary.
It’s frustrating to be told to spend more time on applications when this does not reflect the reality I have experienced. It’s very difficult to tailor applications when most close within a few hours. The current system is geared against both applicants and recruiters as it encourages speedy application over quality and tailoring, meaning the quickest responses, which may not be the most appropriate, get to the sifting stage. I wish I could spend time on applications but there is no facility for this with NHS applications as they close quickly. The real problem is that so much emphasis is put on these posts, although many provide no real useful experience, are fixed term or temporary in nature, and as anon said, pay relatively little considering the amount of experience often required to get to interview stage (in comparison to many other fields). I had hoped that recruiters were sensitive to these difficulties and assumed that they might realise that they probably never even see perhaps the best applicants for the job.
Selection is competitive, it isn’t a situation where everybody can be helped to be a winner. In fact, it takes a huge amount of time to shortlist unless you can quickly discard the majority of applications, so from an employer’s perspective it actually helps to narrow the field significantly. However, this particular job advert was up for a week, so there was no reason for the poor standard of applications. Yet, even when NHS posts are only up for a few hours more than enough applications are good. There are plenty of people who manage to write really good applications within all these constraints (and people have mentioned various techniques for this on the forum). It takes some problem solving, preparation and planning, but from my perspective those are good skills to bring to a post.
As I agree with the posters above, stating that the level of expertise, patience, competence and a factor of luck required for a position feels like too much for a position that will be paid less than my Support Worker position, I have to add that sometimes tailoring applications is very, very difficult. While all the recruiters are asking us to dedicate an extraordinary amount of time in an application, some job descriptions and person specifications will give you no info about the job done in the service. The person specification files are all almost identical. I have applied for jobs where, as much as I’ve read the job description in the webpage, in the file and in the PS, I have no clue which group of users I’d be working with. How is it fair?
It’s a constant feeling of ‘yeah you can apply but we know who we want to hire. And it’s not you.’
Everyday applying I get more the feeling that many of the AP positions are not filled fairly, but based on a random factor that keeps changing and it’s impossible to crack.
And don’t get me started with the ‘ignoring’ policy that runs in the services when you ring/email them to ask for info, informal visits or feedback when you get rejected…
But then yeah, sure. Applicants are all trash.
I haven’t said all applicants are trash. Quite the opposite. I just pointed out that many good applicants write poor applications and sabotage their own chances of getting the post.
For your narrative to be true, we’d never get good tailored applications to jobs. But the truth is that we get plenty enough to appoint from, whilst the same systemic issues affect everyone. So some people are able to find out about the service, and to tailor their application. I suspect it is easier to feel like the system is stacked against you than to think how to improve what you are doing, but that leads to the bitterness you are demonstrating, rather than to an increased chance of success.
Thank you for this post. I think I manage to hit most of your points but could definitely improve on my applications! Thank you particularly for mentioning that an email to the post’s point of contact may be worthwhile if an advert closes early. This happened to me a few months back and I was pretty gutted. Another (better suited) job came along which I am starting next week but it is good to know for the future!
Well this is ironic ….
”Finally, check your working. Make sure you have spelt names and organisations correctly, and not made any silly typos or cutting and pasting errors.”
Maybe you need to check your own wording before hitting publish to avoid making any silly typos in the future…
You’re going to have to point out the “silly typo” because I can’t see it. Unless you think I ought to spell things the American way?
Thanks for this Miriam. I know I’ve been guilty of making a lot of those mistakes e.g. not tailoring the application, typos, not stating things clearly. It took me time to really accept that, and with the suggestions you’ve made, it really did help me secure my previous post (with a host of other interviews- before I wasn’t getting any interviews). I just wanted to say thanks for posting this, as I didn’t have this support and advice when I could have done with it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you so much. I read this before getting my final degree mark and began applying with your tips. Interviewed for 2/6 AP posts applied for, and 1 other role. I have been offered an AP role, rejected for one, and withdrew my application after an interview in the other role after accepting the AP role.
Considering I have just graduated and only have part-time support work experience, I am very fortunate, thank you so much for your brilliant blog posts and also for setting up ClinPsy!
LikeLiked by 1 person