How much do you have to prove? A tale of the modern NHS marketplace

I took a voluntary redundancy from the NHS in 2011. Since then I have run a small company providing clinical psychology services. I mainly do expert witness work for the family courts, which I have blogged about before, but we also offer therapy, consultancy, training, research and other services.

In 2012 we bid for a grant from The Health Foundation to offer brief psychological interventions into the diabetes service for people of all ages at the local hospital. We wanted the bid to be innovative, and so we were determined to think differently about how we structured the service and hoped for it to be commissioned. We decided we would use the grant to set up a Social Enterprise to deliver psychological services, and that we would aim to get commissioners to agree to fund the service in retrospect according to the outcomes we achieved. You read that right – we planned to deliver a service for no cost in return for an agreement to pay for the outcomes we achieved. No more “spend-to-save deadlock” in which the NHS can’t invest in the things that will save money; we were providing the service for no cost to the NHS during the project period and offering to continue to do so, based on retrospective returns dependent upon whether we improved people’s lives and saved costs for their medical treatment. We also agreed to survey the level of mental health need amongst the population using the diabetes service at the hospital, and look at whether this related to their blood test results (which are the best indicator of adherence to medication regimes and lifestyle advice, and of physical health prognosis).

Diabetes is a hot topic because it is predicted to “bankrupt the NHS” due to the rising incidence and cost of treatment. It already costs the NHS £10 billion to treat nearly 4 million people with diabetes in the UK, and this is set to rise to £17 billion by 2035 as the incidence increases to 6.25 million diabetics. Once the loss of working days, early death and informal care costs are factored in, these costs more than double. Even more shocking is the fact that 79% of this expenditure is preventable, if patients followed the lifestyle advice and medication regimes recommended. Studies consistently show that around 40% of people with diabetes have mental health problems, and around 14% of this cost is prevented if there are services to support the psychological health of patients. That is £2.4 billion pounds of avoidable NHS expenditure per year, and around £3.2 billion more in the wider economy. Yet psychological services for people with diabetes are far from universally available.

The Health Foundation loved our proposal and gave us a £75,000 Shine Award to deliver it.

We set up our Social Enterprise which we called Evolving Families. The name is designed to reflect the fact that people change in their thinking, behaviour, learning and roles over their lifespan (and a fair chunk of our work is with adults reflecting on childhood, with parents or with young people whose family circumstances have changed). A Social Enterprise is a business that is run for the benefit of a community, society or environment, and invests the majority of their profits towards that good cause. Our Social Enterprise was designed to invest in delivering psychological services that might not be otherwise funded, like doing research or subsidising people who could not afford to pay for therapy but were not eligible to get what they needed on the NHS.

We used our agility as a small company to employ staff very quickly, and we were up and running for the project to start on 1st Jan 2013. We accepted 65 referrals in the following year (52 adults and 13 children), and closed the project at the end of December 2013. Of those 48 (36 adults, 12 children) attended for psychological therapy and completed pre and post therapy measures, with an average of 6 therapy appointments each. We were able to see people at their homes, at schools, in the community and in our offices. We saw people in the evening if this was more convenient. We went to multi-agency meetings about some of the young people. And most importantly we didn’t have defensive service boundaries – if we felt we could improve psychological wellbeing then we offered services that didn’t directly relate to their diabetes or mental health, for example cognitive assessments, advice about employment, exploration of the impact of neuro-developmental difficulties or sensory impairments.

We screened 750 adults and 100 children who attended the clinics, using the PHQ-SADS (a measure of depression, anxiety and stress used in the IAPT scheme) and the Problem Areas in Diabetes questionnaire. This showed a highly significant relationship between all areas of mental health and HbA1c (the blood glucose score that is the best indicator of how well controlled the diabetes is). There was a very high rate of mental health problems, including a very worrying level of suicidal ideation in both age groups. There was also a very poor level of diabetes control; only 20% had an HbA1c score in the range considered to be optimal (<7) whilst 60% had dangerously elevated levels (>7.5), indicating that this hospital clinic serves a very complex and risky population group.

After the year was complete, we had clear evidence that our service was helpful and cost effective. We made a significant change to participants lives – not bad for 48 people getting  an average of 6 sessions of psychological therapy. Their mental health improved markedly. Fifteen people who were having frequent suicidal thoughts were no longer suicidal, 19 A&E visits in the months before therapy were reduced to 1 in the same number of months after therapy, 30 ward admissions in the same period were down to 5. The cost saved by this reduction in physical treatments was greater than the project cost to deliver. All in all we had pretty impressive results for providing psychological interventions at a cost per head that was lower than IAPT. We were Highly Commended in the HSJ Efficiency Awards.

But did commissioners bite our hand off to take up the offer of paying for the service based on the results it achieved? No. We couldn’t even get to talk to commissioners in person. The hospital told us to talk to the CCG, the CCG told us to talk to the hospital. They told us they need fixed cost contracts to put in their budget, not this outcome based stuff. The contract value is too small to be separately commissioned, and we are outside providers. The service closed to referrals a year ago, and although our service users are passionate about the need for the project and the impact it made on their lives, nobody seems to be listening. So we’ve written a business case and given it to the various service managers at the hospital, and we’ve presented our results locally and we wait, with dwindling hope that it will be picked up at some point in the future. Maybe in the next financial year. Maybe when they reconfigure the diabetes provision.

So I ask: how much do you have to prove in the modern NHS marketplace? If we can deliver a highly effective, life-changing service, and save the NHS more than it costs within the financial year, and we are prepared to accept payment in arrears based on the outcomes we achieve, what more can we do?

Video flash of powerpoint showing outcome data for the project is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyVfGOkdD0

Service user comments about the project are here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KsQDgs-yDq4

Slow burn: Reflecting on the emotional impact of working with chronic trauma*

*This post contains vignettes of harrowing material which may upset some readers. Case examples are all anonymised.

When I decided to do work in child protection, people warned me it was the fast road to burnout. Twenty years later I think they are right about the direction, if not about the speed.

Burnout is an insidious thing. It sneaks up on you as a chronic accumulation of many tiny things, rather than having an obvious trigger, like a single life threatening event that causes PTSD. A thousand small examples of vicarious traumatisation. Experiences that I shouldn’t complain about as I’ve chosen a career that inevitably brings exposure to distress and tragedy. It feels like I’ve chosen to wade through the grottiest parts of life, until I’m normed on that 1% of stories that cause the most concern. It saturates me. Pollutes my perceptions of life. It has been building up for a long time.

Fifteen years ago my two specialist placements included post abuse work with survivors of sexual abuse, a group for non-abusing parents of children who had been sexually abused and work with “complex” children and families, such as those on the child protection register. I knew it was emotionally harrowing work then. I talked about it with a good friend, and concluded that my drive was to go where I was most needed, to grapple with the most complex cases, and that I’d worry about burnout when I got there. I graduated onto a clinic for children who were “failing to thrive” and most of my clinical time being with children in care and therapeutic work with those who had experienced trauma or maltreatment. Right from the start, it was an induction of fire, salved only by the fact that it was important work that needed to be done.

It started with individual stories.

The sad silent child who ate 7 digestive biscuits and carefully stowed extras in his pockets during clinic, but whose parents claimed he had a digestive disorder that meant he wasn’t gaining weight despite eating plenty.

The young woman with learning disabilities who repeatedly played out how the daddy bear lay on top of the baby bear and thrust, but said baby bear was a liar and nobody believed her when she told.

The adult relatives who revealed at the last moment the sadistic physical and sexual abuse that their step-father inflicted, after he had charmed the professionals enough to get residence of his grand children, when their mother was unable to cope and had reverted to chronic drug use.

The maps of children’s bodies in medical notes, used for annotating injuries, including one for babies. The paediatricians sharing photographs of torn orifices, injuries, malnourishment and legs with rickets. “This one has burns on their hands up to a straight line on their arms, showing they were held in boiling water as a punishment”. No, I don’t want to see, thanks.

The little girl in a religious cult who couldn’t disclose her abuser as she had been taught it was as bad to think or speak badly of others as what they had done, and shown pictures of people rotting in the ground or burning in hell for their sins.

The boy who was conceived through rape, whose mother couldn’t look at him, and whose grandmother thought any challenging behaviour showed he was “living up to his genes”.

A girl asking how she got the zigzag scar on her stomach. The family didn’t want to tell her about how her mother tried to cut her open to let the devil out during a puerperal psychosis. They don’t want to spoil the relationship as she goes to Mum for alternate weekends. When I meet Mum she talks incoherently about spirits and auras, telling me she likes climbing on the roof to be nearer to God. She has no need of adult mental health services, thanks.

The young woman who always claims to be pregnant by her current partner. He is less likely to harm her that way. She is couch surfing at the moment, which is the new name for homeless. Her only possession is a photograph of her son who was removed at birth and adopted. After physical and sexual abuse at home, and attempts to stay with numerous relatives, she grew up in care. She had a sexual relationship with her male carer at 14 which she views as consensual.

Since 2000 I have done expert witness work for the family courts. That means reading bundles of documents about trauma, child abuse, neglect, loss, violence, family breakdowns and mental health problems. It means speaking to parents who have been maltreated in their own lives, lack coping resources and instead of being able to create healthy relationships and flourish have limped from one bad experience to another. It involves speaking to children who have seen too much, had to cope with awful things and missed out on the love and nurture that you’d want every child to take for granted. I read about and sometimes see the state of the home, with rubbish heaped up and rotting, flies circling, dirty nappies on the floor, no clean clothing, nowhere to store possessions and no space that isn’t filled with clutter. I hear about broken bones, bruises, burns, rapes and assaults. Sometimes there are x-rays, photographs or medical records. I see sadness and anger accumulated over many years of getting a raw deal. I measure problems with learning, attention, behaviour, life skills, self-esteem and mental health. I observe who denies the problems, who spills over with them, and who recognises themselves doing as they were done by despite all their best intentions otherwise.

I read, and I listen. I measure and observe. I pull the pieces together to see what fits and what conflicts. It is an active process, trying to understand what happened, how and why. Evaluating insight and future risks. A computer couldn’t be programmed to do this. It takes empathy, curiosity, critical thinking and detective skills. I am the barometer of relationships, of what would feel okay, of what is causing harm. If I felt nothing, I couldn’t do the job. But there is so much pain to feel. So many sad stories.

A little girl with curly dark blond hair who the foster carer told me “shook with excitement to get her own dolly for the first time and promised to keep it pristine so that when mummy gives it to her little sister she will still think it is new”. I nod politely. Take verbatim notes. I have to stop the car on the way home for a cry.

A teenage boy tells me how his father often pinned him up against the wall by his neck or beat him with a belt. He wonders why he dissociates when he perceives threat or criticism now and worries that he is going mad. I try to explain his brain learnt to protect him when nothing else could.

I observe the baby that was rescued from the fire. Her scars are healing slowly, and the medical treatments are painful. She can’t bear to be touched. There is too much pain for someone so young.

A mother tells me how it hurts her watching the foster carer do a better job than she was able to at caring for her children. “I always swore I’d be different to my mum, make better choices of partner than she did, keep my kids safe from harm. I look at where we are now and see it has happened all over again and I can’t bear it”. And neither can I.

A teenage girl tells me she took the overdose because her step-dad broke the door down and overturned the bed to reach where she and her mother were hiding, and hit her mother repeatedly with the broken bed leg. She shrugs and smiles, and says “its just how it is, you know”. I don’t know. But trying to imagine it makes my guts curl and my eyes leak involuntarily.

A mother tells me about the culture she grew up in, and how grateful she is to be here, even though the whole family live in a single room in slum conditions, and it is hard to find work as an illegal immigrant. If her son is hungry, developmentally delayed, and being beaten for misbehaviour at least he is safe. I think that isn’t safe. It is all relative.

A father tells me that his uncle sexually abused him as a young boy, but there was too much stigma to tell anyone and he was afraid to lose this special relationship. He still spends time with his uncle now, and trusts him implicitly with his own children. A few sentences later he says he is baffled why the children are showing sexualised behaviour. I am baffled that other people can’t see how obviously the pieces fit together.

I assess a couple that smell so bad I struggle not to gag. I open the windows but it is not enough. I go out for air every hour. A social worker sprays perfume on my sleeve so I can raise it to my face to mask the smell. I learn the phrase “body odour to an extent causing discomfort to anyone in the proximity”. They don’t own toothbrushes and show me teeth rotting in swollen gums.

A woman tells me she has put on 9 stone as she needs to have fat deeper than the knife blade is long, since she was stabbed by her ex-partner. She wheezes for a long time after climbing the stairs at the contact centre, and she struggles to get down on the floor to play with the baby. I worry when she is slower than expected to return from the toilet, do I need to check if she is okay?

The child was born with HIV. His mother died of it. He lives with his grandmother. She doubts the diagnosis. “He doesn’t look ill, the English doctors don’t know about us”, she says when I ask why his prescriptions have not been collected.

A lady tells me that she must have had post natal depression. If she wasn’t ill she would keep the house clean, but when she is ill she can hardly get out of bed, and gets ideas that the world is very unsafe. That is why she kept the children in her bed with her, rather than sending them to school, until they were no longer able to walk. She’s on antidepressants now, and saw a counsellor for six sessions, so everything will be fine. The social workers are making a fuss about nothing.

A man tells me he has exercised to pass the time whilst in prison. He is proud that he is bigger and tougher than his father now. He says the robbery was the fault of the friends who bought him the beer and suggested the idea, and much exaggerated by the victim. I am glad I brought with a student to observe, as the room is quite isolated and his body language makes me tense.

This couple have managed to sustain the acrimony of their separation for five years. She says he was controlling, violent and obsessive about having every last penny accounted for. She tolerated his promiscuity for far too long. He says she was moody and manipulative, and it is probably her mental health that’s the problem, and her jealousy that he moved onto another relationship. It makes me cross that both of them seem to have forgotten the kids in the middle of their conflict.

A little boy tells me what it felt like to be buggered. I try not to think about it that night in bed. I play tetris on my phone until I fall asleep at 4am.

A woman tells me that all of her relationships have been with men who present a sexual risk with children. They are all so different, she says, that whenever she learns what to avoid the next one is nothing like it. And why wouldn’t you move in with someone you’ve just met? How else do you get somewhere to live after the last relationship has turned sour?

The story stems of a girl of eight show the family repeatedly pushing the girl off a cliff and laughing at her. For variation they poison her and laugh as she vomits. She repeats the loop for 90 minutes, then returns to lying foetal under the table as I leave, just as she was when I arrived.

“I had a cold, mum caught it, and it made her sick so she fell down the stairs” says the boy with autism. “That is why she had to go to hospital”. It wasn’t the head injuries her partner caused, it was his fault. But later in the conversation “Daddy gets out of prison soon. When he finds us he will kill us this time”. It is deadpan. An emotionless fact of life.

The girl in the children’s ward tells me “I didn’t want to go home. I jumped off the bridge because it would be better to be dead. They say I will need to be in hospital at least six weeks whilst my leg heals”. She smiles showing me the metal cage and all the pins reassembling her bones, and counts the pieces in the x-ray. She won’t say what is wrong at home.

“He spat right in my face and pushed me over. I was so angry then. I hit him with the lamp until it broke, then I whipped him with the cable. I could see the shape of the switch in the bruises when I was done. They might have seen it, but that’s not the same. I’d never hurt the children.”

A boy tells me what is different in foster care. “It was the best day ever. We went to the garden centre. I got to look at the fish, and we had a drink and a slice of cake at the cafe. We eat at the table with the grown ups here. I got my own coat too, nobody wore it before me! And my skin is better”. The carers tell me that they had to wash the grime off the bath after he arrived, replace all his clothes and do twice daily treatments of his infected eczema. They had to get a court order to shave off his matted hair as his parents would not give consent.

A five year old girl tells me about the day she came into care. “I could hear they had fish and chips in the front room. I could smell it. I tried to walk there, but my legs weren’t working and I kept falling over”. The medical records show that a visitor called an ambulance when they saw her unconscious and malnourished. Her blood test results are marked with blue biro. Haemoglobin is captioned “how is she alive?”. She dances when she shows me the foster carers have a rabbit run in the garden.

In each family I hear many of these stories from each individual, and I see several families each month for assessment. I’ve been doing this for over a decade now. I have banked hundreds of such narratives, maybe a thousand. All involve a child or children being harmed. The stories are each unique, but the themes recur. James blurs into Joshua and Jared and Jacob. Samira merges with Samantha and Saskia and Sasha. Depression and anxiety, broken bones and bruises, filth and mayhem, conflict and violence, cancer, obesity and sensory impairment, neglect and abuse heap up in my repertoire of human experience and leak out into my life. I see those stories lurking at the edge of my vision, in the arguments partially overheard in the shops, or behind the headlines in the news. I see their echoes amongst people that I know; my neighbours and colleagues and friends.

I set myself impossible standards. I worry if my child has messy hair when she gets back from school, or I notice mud under her fingernails. Will people think we aren’t taking proper care of them? Are we not taking proper care of them? We go to A&E after my daughter burns her hand. I ask her to tell the story before I speak and she says “it was your fault mummy, it was your drink that tipped over”. I feel like a failure and a hypocrite. My cat has a jaw infection and needs teeth removed and antibiotics. I should have known. He smells like the couple I assessed at the social work centre last year.

I say we need to leave the restaurant. I can hear a mother saying “ungrateful brat, I should never have had you” to her son. Outside the school a mother pushing a baby in a pram says to her friend “look at him giving me evils, he’s going to be just like his father”. I walk away. The couple outside the pub argue incoherently and their voices get louder and shriller as we walk back to our car after a night out. The child in the park approaches me and asks me to push him on the swings. People on the internet disclose abuse. In the supermarket I hear a slap and the child is crying. The woman walks past on the street with a fading black eye. They are anonymous and legion. The scale of the problem is overwhelming. I can do nothing.

Friends of friends ask for advice as they have heard I am a psychologist. Its important to try to point people in the right direction, but I am depleted. Another 2 lever arch files arrive at work. Its an incest case and mother is terminally ill. Surely there can be no more stories this bad, but there is a queue awaiting my attention. The next one has police transcripts of the interviews of all of Dad’s victims. He might be a paedophile but his daughter wants to see him anyway. The one after that they want me to see Dad whilst he is in prison for abducting the children to a different country. He believes it is his right; fathers own children in his culture. Then back to the bread and butter of court work, another family where neglect and maltreatment has been the norm through many generations. One of the children is the same age and gender as one of mine. Don’t make comparisons. Don’t go there. Change the subject.

A letter from a solicitor tells me that my invoice has been reduced by the Legal Aid Agency on appraisal. I will get £400 less than the total billed, despite not billing for 6 hours work already because of the fee caps. The hours were “not proportionate”. Do I explain again that it takes longer to do assessments via a translator? I don’t have the energy. Another one is querying the hourly rate. I should work for £7 less if I only see the adults as I won’t be a child psychologist. I ask if a psychiatrist gets paid the rate for a psychotherapist if they don’t diagnose or prescribe. The solicitor is sympathetic but says there is nothing they can do. A father doesn’t attend an appointment that is booked to fill a whole day. I have driven 2 hours to get here, and I wait for an hour whilst phone calls are made, then drive 2 hours home, exhausted. I can do nothing else with my day. Legal Aid say a psychologist can fill their time productively with other activities and refuse to pay anything over travel costs, even though the contract says that they will pay for any appointment cancelled with less than 72 hours notice. I can’t bill for materials, venues or typing. The questionnaires cost an average of £5.31 each. I used 6 per child and there were 7 children in the family. Does it add enough to my report to justify £220 of lost income? The LAA ask what ‘capacity’ is and why it took me 4 hours to assess it. Is it not embarrassing to work for the family court system and not to know this or to have the sense to Google? The self-funding father who was supposed to have lodged the cost of the report with his solicitor hasn’t. He now wants to pay in monthly instalments, but my staff get paid next week. I have to turn away two cases a day after reading about the plight of the children, because I am booked up too far ahead. The wealthy mother from abroad hasn’t paid her share of the bill from 4 months ago, but the court wants me to do more work for her case. There are 16 follow-up questions from the report I filed last week. Why do I do this again?

Tomorrow is the appointment to assess the teenage mother in the mother and baby unit. Yesterday her boyfriend told me about how they met online, and gave me their usernames. Google shows me his dating site entries seeking single mothers, Facebook posts about the violence in their relationship and a video of the baby’s “sexy dance”. A solicitor phones. Can I squeeze in one extra case this month? Mother has been evicted. She doesn’t want to see her child and is too anxious to talk to her lawyers. Could I fit the capacity assessment in this week? I get an email to my personal account. My builder’s sister’s son is feeling suicidal. I reply with the phone numbers for the Samaritans and the local crisis service. I watch the news story about the children in the refugee camp and am horrified to find I feel nothing. I have reached compassion fatigue. I turn off my phone and computer and go back to bed.

I am empty. My emotional resources have run out. Is this constant aching tiredness what they call burnout? I run on clockwork. I am a robot Mum and a robot wife. I fall asleep on the sofa. I am exhausted. At night when I finally fall to sleep I dream about children with their eyes sewn shut. I can’t save them all. When I wake I go to work and do it all over again. I’m good at this. It is important. It is needed. It is never ending.

Then I pause and take a few weeks off for a family holiday. Soon after we arrive the bubble of numbness bursts. I cry watching a video on Youtube. It segues into crying for all the children I’ve met, and all the children someone like me never met or didn’t reach in time, including the parents I speak to so often. I cry with frustration at my own limited reach. I cry for the selfishness of politicians, the broken systems and missing safety nets. I despair at how you increasingly need money to buy justice, and how hopeless and disengaged wide tranches of society are becoming. I click to sign petitions. I donate to campaigns. I counsel compassion in online debates. But I am tired. Achingly tired. Tired in my bones and my guts and my heart. I know how much this needs to be done. And I don’t know what else I can do. But I can’t do this any more.

A shallow look at fat

In her usual abrasive style, Katie Hopkins’ latest click-bait project is ‘to fat and back’ – she is putting on 3.5 stone in weight and will then lose it again, to show us how easy weight loss is and how there is no excuse for being fat. Some journalists appear to think there is something in it whilst others are a little more sceptical.

To me it seems obesity isn’t a simple matter of will power. You can’t will yourself thin any more than you can will yourself out of depression or addiction. The evidence shows diets don’t work, and once obese it is very hard to revert to lower weights again and sustain it. It is much better to aim for a healthier diet and lifestyle than a smaller body. And despite widespread understanding that fatness is associated with poor health outcomes, it is very hard to change, and often reinforced by stigma and shame. Your ability to change the pattern will depend on how long it has been around, your biology and what caused it to start in the first place, as well as your commitment to change, support network and what else is going on in your life. In Clinical Psychology we look at the biological, psychological and social contributors to particular behaviours or symptoms and make a formulation of how these interplay, so it is frustrating when people with no expertise pronounce easy solutions which ignore these factors.

If a thin person with very negative ideas about obesity puts on weight for three months, they will find it unpleasant, find losing weight rewarding, and have all the previous factors that made them thin before to revert to. If she is being filmed and paid then she has financial and performance pressures to succeed also, her reputation and career to maintain, as well as a wardrobe to return to. She has the metabolism, muscle tone, neurochemistry and lifestyle of a slimmer person. Will three months change that? She has people around her who expect her to be active and slim, and will support her returning to that familiar mould. And when losing weight she has the money for personal trainers, gym memberships and healthy food (if not diet systems and products) and the sense of herself as a thin person who is capable of exercise.

It’s a million miles away from being a chronically obese person and trying to lose the same amount of weight. To pretend this is a serious experiment that will tell us something about how to lose weight is playing at a serious issue. It reminds me of Pulp’s Common People.

A real obese person has a lifetime of thoughts and feelings about their body, and the perceptions others have of them. They carry internalised shame and self-criticism that associates fat with laziness, gluttony, lack of willpower, and lack of self-respect. They probably avoid eating in public, or showing their body shape. They might not feel comfortable going to places where attention is drawn to their size, or they would stand out compared to thinner, fitter people – like gyms, swimming pools, or exercise classes (because statistically the people who you see there most are the fittest people, and not other new starters or people who find it hard, because these attend less and are more likely to drop out over time, whilst health/success is self-sustaining).

And the weight may have many origin stories that are tied in to uncomfortable issues they wish to avoid thinking about or haven’t yet resolved. They may have put on weight after a trauma or loss, during a pregnancy, or to insulate themselves from the world, or because food is the only pleasure in their life. They might comfort eat because feeding is tied in to their experiences of nurture. The origins of the ACEs study show that morbid obesity is associated with severe early trauma, with 55% of patients in a bariatric surgery clinic disclosing childhood sexual abuse (usually incest). It can be a form of slow suicide, or a daily process of numbing out the pain and yet unwittingly reinforcing the body shame that they experience.

Or it can have less extreme causes. The individual might be ignorant about healthy eating, or have other lifestyle constraints that make healthy eating harder, like poverty or chronic sleep deprivation, or a family/peer group that consume huge amounts of calories (whether the 20 pint weekend, the endless cake in the office, massive portions or regular takeaways being delivered). They might have health conditions or disabilities that make exercise or even activity difficult. They may have developed psychological and neurochemical reward pathways for their eating pattern. They may feel shamed by the societal pressures to conform to what is considered attractive in the airbrushed models on glossy magazines and find thinking about losing weight a painful and ever-present topic (see this paper by Ratcliffe and Ellison last year). On the other hand, they may be ambivalent about weight loss. Their partners, parents, friends or kids may be used to their shape and habits, or even like it. They may have had many experiences of previous attempts at weight-loss that have been unsuccessful or were quickly regained. Change in many circumstances is really hard to make, and harder to sustain.

Every obesity story is different. I know people who feel they need to be heavier than a past abuser or dominating partner, so they can’t be pushed around again. I know people who want a layer of protection against a dangerous world. I know people who want fat deeper than a knife blade is long, in case they are attacked again. I know people who want to deter any sexual attention. I know people too anxious to leave their house to shop or exercise, or too poor to afford fruit and veg or to pay for fuel to cook with. I know serotonin junkies where food is their drug of choice. I know exhausted people who fend off tiredness with sugar. I know of people who eat because they are under stress. I know a lot of unhappy people who don’t think they deserve better, or could ever be attractive or physically fit. I know people who are hopeless about ever losing weight (often within a wider sense of hopelessness about their lives). I know people who have spent their whole lives being fat and living a lifestyle constrained by that fat – tired, big, heavy and excluded from physical activities. Mocked at every turn. Excluded from aspects of society. Disempowered. Weight loss is categorically different from that starting point, and it is not just naive but wilfully ignorant to pretend otherwise.

Of course, I also know people who like being fat, have come to accept themselves as they are, or who see their weight as a very low priority in life. There are women who enjoy defying what they see as body fascism or sexist expectations about women’s appearance, or who simply see their curves as sexy. I can see the appeal in filtering away the shallow people who care about how people look more than who they are and what they do. And I’m aware that BMI is a blunt tool for measuring obesity, as it ignores body composition and scores people with high levels of muscle as equivalently “unhealthy” to those with little muscle, despite the positive differences in health that resistance exercise is known to make.

Katie won’t be happy being fat, and maybe it will give her some perspective about how judged and self conscious people feel when they are overweight. Maybe she’ll show some hitherto hidden empathy or concern for others apart from herself, but I doubt it. The promotional spots so far suggest the usual dose of hubris and ignorance, carefully engineered to provide publicity. I see this program as part of our obsession with celebrity and appearance, and the tendency to discuss serious issues (especially those affecting women primarily) with no depth. Hopkins has become the mouthpiece of internalised sexism; the pervasive belief that women need to be decorative rather than functional to be of value, and therefore shouldn’t think about issues beyond their own appearance and judging the appearance of others. She is also a caricature “baddy” that earns her living by being controversial, and by saying things that are not socially acceptable but that reinforce the wider narratives of the organisations that give her air or column space, who like to blame the individual and turn attention away from the real underlying socio-political causes.

Finally, I am reminded of a line that is helpful to think to yourself when experiencing playground bullies: I’d rather have my weight than your attitude. For all the challenges involved in losing weight, it’s still easier than changing personality or gaining empathy after years as a callous, judgemental, self-serving, attention seeking provocateur.

The best of both worlds?

It was the right decision to decline the job in Scotland, but it hasn’t been an easy option to stay put, as its perpetuated my “midlife-crisis” stuff (maybe also related to my impending 40th birthday). I feel like moving wasn’t the solution, as the challenges are of my own making and would have travelled with me. However staying doesn’t negate the need to make major changes in my life. It is a process that is taking me a lot of time and thought. I’ve been reading a lot about business, personal and professional development, happiness and people who have had inspiring lives or worked towards changing some of the problems that humanity is facing. I’ve got a determination to make a difference through my work, and to apply my psychological knowledge to making life better for people (especially young people who have experienced adversity). I’m gradually figuring out some things I feel very positive about.

The metaphor I am currently using is that in terms of my career I thought I was on a train from London to Leeds – a nice, direct, predetermined route that has been travelled by many people before me. However, due to austerity politics, the train got a bit rickety and the line was diverted so the train was destined to travel via Hull (perhaps into the north sea). So, I got out and tried to catch a series of buses to get me closer to my original destination, Leeds. However, nothing seems to offer a direct route, and some of the diversions are interesting enough that I’ve begun to wonder about getting off the main road and exploring on my bike. It may be that I find a new route I want to follow, or that I get a lift to somewhere else entirely or join a group of other cyclists – the main thing is <can you guess where this is going?> to enjoy the journey once again. So I’m going to just do more of what gives me joy and excitement and see where I end up!

In my personal life I reckon I need to prioritise sleeping, eating well, exercising, getting outdoors and spending time with the kids. I want to develop a social life, creative challenges, an inspiring network of peers, and spend less time on work but ensure this is more focused on things I feel absolutely passionately are my point of highest impact. I also need to get my kids into a school that is equally able to individualise, support and challenge them, and to become actively part of the school community. In terms of work I need to both diversify what we offer, so there is less pressure on court work being our main source of income and focus in on the stuff I personally want to be doing within the company. On a more practical level I need to sort out the business finances, catch up with a 400 email backlog and fill our current vacancy.

I feel like I’ve had a bit of a rough time recently in that the Legal Aid Authority are reducing fees and querying ever more invoices. The business hasn’t made enough money for me to take home much more than minimum wage so far this year, and I’ve had a few stressors in my personal life (and the recent mega pollen count has meant I’ve had a bit of asthma, which is always frustrating). However, on balance, it has been a time of positive changes for me. First, I found a personal development coach I really clicked with. He’s a yoga teacher who only works with people with a passion to do good in the world, so it will wake up my hippy heritage and values, and help me <cliche>think outside the box</cliche> of the established ways things are done in public sector behemoths like the NHS and social care. I’m also developing a set of digital tools from a questionnaire I designed, typing them in to a new system for psychologically informed care planning in children’s homes with an online measurement and tracking system. I have an idea about a website too. Some of these projects are worthy of substantial financial investment, so I am looking into social impact bonds and venture capital to see where to take them. Of course, nothing is ever guaranteed, and I can’t do these things without some financial support, but it feels like a good direction of travel. I’ve learned over and over in my career that I like to innovate, evaluate, refine and disseminate and I get bored with the rinse and repeat of delivering the same thing again and again. So that is what I’m going to do :D

Weighing up a new offer

Downsizing the business was painful but also allowed me to think more widely again. Apart from me, the business now has one AP (we peaked at 3), 15 hours of admin and 7 of operational management. A new qualified CP is starting for 8 hours per week to pick up some direct therapy work, and will increase over time to take on some LAC work. I’m doing one day per month of consultancy and training to a regional LAC project, and I’ve cut down the court work a little. I have some ideas about potential research bids, though I’m currently lacking the energy to write them after a series of knock-backs. I am however developing some technical projects (an app and a website based tool) and hoping to pay someone to do the social media stuff that has lapsed.

However I am also looking more seriously at NHS and academic posts (to see if I can find something super-inspiring that would fit within the 9-5 in a location that we like), and exploring other options in terms of personal development to address my workaholism and get more balance in my life. I want to find time to be creative, have a social life, do fun stuff, and self-care, as well as work and family time. I love CP, but it can’t be my whole life with the kids and my husband just squeezed into a corner.

Update: The big news is that I’ve been offered an NHS job again, in Scotland where the landscape is glorious and the NHS less massacred, so have to figure out whether I want to take it. I’m a bit overwhelmed with the decision as the two options feel very hard to compare.

The NHS job would be a return to 9-5 which is fewer hours, but less flexibly arranged. The salary is lower than my current earnings, but it would also offer the NHS pension and protection of sick pay. It seems like a lovely service with a wide remit and a focus on quality, and would bring me into contact with lots of other professionals. I’d also have scope to do some research as well as my committee commitments, in paid time. The work would be more varied and less grim. And I’d be paid a salary and not have to invoice, haggle and chase overdue amounts. However relocating is a big unknown. It will be expensive and stressful, and I don’t know what my other half would do for work. Plus I’d be less well connected geographically and need to learn about a new culture/locality. The winters are also darker and colder. But I might enjoy doing up a new home or self-building, and we’d be able to choose to live in the catchment of a good school and have a good quality of life, and Scottish people are generally friendly and pragmatic.

Continuing my current role involves loads of work but arranged much more flexibly. It can earn more, but that is dependent on what I do and how reliably I invoice and chase up the money (though I might be able to employ someone to take this on or delegate more of it to my operational manager). I don’t have the same protection of pension or sick pay, but I do try to invest and I don’t get ill much. The majority of my earnings come from court work which is very heavy material, and all my extra-curricular stuff (committees, research, writing bids, peer supervision, reading, CPD) is in unpaid time. I’ve not been successful in securing funding for clinical or research projects. But I’m well known and well located, and good at what I do, plus I enjoy the challenge and rigour of the court work. Its also less hassle to stay where we are, though we don’t have much of a social network locally and being the boss of a small company is quite isolating. We are not super keen on our locality here, as it is bland and flat, but it is very convenient with every supermarket within a few miles, a gym with childcare down the road, and the motorway and rail links on hand. Plus recently I’ve had a good run of speaking at events, offering training and consultancy within this region or easy travel range. I’m also loathe to lose the company I’ve built up over many years (though I could potentially keep it open without being directly involved myself) and my husband has a job here that fits in school hours – though there is some reorganisation going on that might threaten that.

I feel very spoilt having the choice. Deciding seems like a “first world problem” of the highest order. Its a decision between two good options, and we are very lucky to also be financially secure enough to choose to do neither of them – I could take a year out and be an at home mum or do a PhD and we’d still have a home to live in and food on the table due to my husband’s salary covering our modest living expenses. On this wonderful reminder of where we stand in the world we are in the top 1% for income and top 2% for assets, which is a pretty stark reminder of how many people cannot take this stuff for granted.

I sat down with my husband over the weekend to look at our goals and dreams, and it seems they relate rather little to what work we do! Here they are:

– have more physical and emotional energy for the kids
– have more leisure time to read, grow veg (M), do creative stuff (M) and play video games (T)
– get strong and healthy (M&T) and play football (T)
– get a social life (M)
– get rid of accumulated stuff that isn’t meaningful
– increase retirement income/passive sources of income
– take more holidays, including at least one chance to dive/snorkel per year (M)
– build or renovate a dream house
– make video games (T) and a work related app (M)
– complete my study of risk and resilience in adoption, and use the BERRI measure to look at outcomes for young people in residential care, influencing practise to improve life for LAAC and writing another book, some papers and perhaps get a visiting academic role.

If I stay here I need to delegate all the operational management and financial stuff I don’t like, and start to share the court work with a colleague, so I work less from home. In short – improve quality of life and social connectedness by reducing work and gaining leisure time/energy, and focus the work I’m doing on improving the knowledge base and consulting/training more.

Last night it felt like these would be best achieved by moving to Scotland. This morning like I’d rather build on what I’ve started here. But its good to have identified goals at least, as that means positive change wherever we are!

Outcome: I declined the job in Scotland.

I had been worried about what it would mean for my husband, moving away from my family, losing my total autonomy and letting down the people I employ. Plus I was concerned that it was more a fantasy of a different life than the reality of this particular post that attracted me. Speaking to the previous post-holder sealed the deal. She reminded me of all the problems I had left behind. I’ve always hated inter-profession politics and being stuck in middle management where the needs of the workers and clients are opposed to the targets of the folk at the top would be my idea of hell. Plus it would be a huge upheaval/expense and I didn’t know how we’d cope with the darker/colder winters.

I am now thinking I need to change my own barriers to having a better work life balance, rather than thinking that will only come with a change of my role or geographical location. Interestingly it reinforced my recurrent theme of wanting choice but not taking it. It also made me think again about my seemingly disparate motivations of ‘doing good for humanity’ by improving knowledge and practise and through this increasing quality of life for others (my hippy goals) and having ‘success’ in the form of autonomy, influence, status and quality of life (my yuppie goals). The challenge is how to achieve these things from here. The TEDx event I went to yesterday was inspiring in that regard, looking at ‘generosity, greed and the greater good’. It made me feel like I need to find a way to fund my grand plan to improve the quality of life for LAAC.

Ripping off the plaster

I need to work out what the next goals are. I’ve never had ambitions to drive a porsche or own a mansion with a gym and jacuzzi or anything like that, and I don’t have a goal for turnover or numbers of employees, or to take over the NHS. I just want to do good work that is free at the point of access for those who need it, with people I like around me. Not that I wouldn’t like to win a big contract, just that its never been on my radar.

I’ve had a great summer of slowing the pace and reclaiming life since the end of July. I’ve made a real effort not to bring work home, and for the last 6 weeks I’ve been going to the gym after work and doing the school run more often. But that rests on doing very little court work, which feels like I’m not working enough!

Its weird having health things too, as I’m usually so resilient. I’ve got ocular hypertension (the precursor to glaucoma) which has meant a lot of eye tests, and I also need some medical investigations, but it has been hard to prioritise me time. My friends and colleagues from the forum reminded me to value being a mum as ‘worthy’ and ‘work’ too. They are right that I need to give myself permission to prioritise me a bit more, and accept good enough rather than perfection (which I think I do with therapy delivery, but don’t with other aspects of the business).

It made me think about my drive to overwork. I think its a family story. My mum has been a hard worker (early consultant CP, head of service, in an era where mainly men attained that rank). My Dad was a creative person who had a lot of time off with ME-like symptoms when I was a kid. My mum’s mum was a hard working single mother in an era where there were not really single mothers, and remarried unhappily but wished she hadn’t (and probably impressed upon my mum at some level the value of supporting yourself and marrying for love). Plus my heritage is as an immigrant squared – my great grandparents/grandparents were persecuted Jews who earned their way up from nothing when they fled from Russia to South Africa, and then my parents came to the UK and built a new life. There is a high value on the opportunity for a good education and the value of hard work. There is also a very high value on parenting – my mum took a 5 year career break to have kids and I feel bad for not giving the kids enough priority.

When I take on too much it is difficult being emotionally available when it matters most (for family) when there is work stress and heavy stories and overload sapping your resources. It is something I will pick up in my peer supervision. I’ve also emailed the management coach I did a few sessions with to set up another session. But I did want to be open about the fact that being outside of the NHS makes this stuff harder. The seductive thing about self-employment is that doing more -> more income and better reputation, so it isn’t like a salaried job where you can say I’ve done enough to fulfil my contract. My mum says court work glitters, in that it offers money, influence, an intellectual riddle, a role in the theatre of the court process. It is hard to say no to. But I think that’s just icing on my workaholic cake.

I’ve got lots of exciting links building for me personally, which give me optimism (meeting with DfE LAC lead on Monday, two book ideas, four keynotes/talks to good audiences in new year and a helpful new connection in health economics with an interest in my adoption research and useful links to tap). I’ve also been trying to read about successful entrepreneurship and thinking a lot more about what my big goals are. I’ve decided I care less about being a provider of therapy than I do about changing thinking and practise to improve the lives of vulnerable children and families. I want to help answer the big questions about how to know who needs fostering as opposed to adopting, who needs residential care and what defines an effective placement, what risk and resilience factors affect placement stability, what works for families on the cusp of care. I want to write books and papers and speak at conferences and influence government policy. These are ambitious goals, but not impossible if I don’t get bogged down with taking on other stuff that is on an individual scale.

But I’ve had to bite the bullet and look at redundancies for the diabetes project. Everyone is telling me that this is just business and the state of the economy and not to feel bad. And I know that if I was managing an nhs team and they told me the budget was being cut and two posts have to go I’d manage to put these two posts forward and get on with it with my identity intact as a decent person. The difference here is I feel there is no-one else to blame, and the nature of being the business owner means I’m making people redundant out of choice to preserve my own income (or allow some in the first place). And that sucks and hits at some of my own schemas. I didn’t promise people permanent jobs, but I had started to hope we could create them, and it feels tremendously sad that we didn’t.

On the good side, it always feels better once you’ve ripped the plaster off. It’s horrible to have to let people go, but on the other hand gives me a better base to think what I really want to do in future. That could be take up a job or travel abroad or go into academia or go back to some sole trader court work or providing consultation and therapy. My only real commitment is to a month more court work and a few conference talks and I’ll have a trickle of court work income for at least the next year to subsidise whatever I choose. So I feel like personally I’m okay, which is why I feel so guilty, as it seems like a selfish decision.

I’m starting to feel like the court work has made me feel quite burned out. It is fine to hear a grim story once a month, but four times a month for two years has been too much, and I’m tiring of the petty haggling over invoices. And that’s before the final round of fee cuts kick in. Given the business side hasn’t been as productive, and I don’t want to take on therapy myself, that leaves me the options of going into a primarily research role or returning to a clinical post within an organisation. I’m starting to browse NHS jobs and consider the consultant grade posts with children and families more positively, but I need to be careful that this isn’t just a rebound fling.

Meanwhile a few small positive opportunities have come in for the business that make me wonder whether what I want is someone experienced who can take on the delivery of the business for me, and perhaps pick up some court work, either on commission or as a contractor, whilst I take some time to explore my options…

Addendum: As painful as it was, reducing the salary bill has made everything feel less burdensome. I’ve gone through all the finances with the accountant and can see that I’ve managed to pull out of the dive ahead of catastrophe and held back enough funds to earn a reasonable income this year. I’ve also had lots of positive feedback from training and consultancy I’ve done recently and got re-enthused about the research aspect of my work. A children’s home has commissioned me to do some training, consultancy and outcome evaluation for them and we’ve got the opportunity to bid for some “widening the impact” funding for our diabetes project this month, and are likely to go and present it in the USA at a conference in the summer. I’ve also spoken to an amazing guy who is a very senior accountant but interested in the economics of social issues who might be able to link me up to some useful people. I’ve had a couple of good people enquire about contracting to do the therapy work here. I’m even thinking again about finishing off my adoption risk and resilience research and submitting it for publication somewhere, maybe as a book. I want to stretch my brain again, and that is the topic closest to my heart.

Challenging times

Time for another update, but sadly not a positive one.

On the good side, I got new accountants who sorted out the mess and applied for my tax rebate (though it is still to materialise), and moved to a new online system for keeping my financial records which is great. My AP got onto training and left in September. The diabetes project was Highly Commended in the FSJ Efficiency awards. We had lots of positive interest in what we were doing and put in 3 substantial bids. I’ve been invited to speak at a range of exiting national conferences, and I’ve been involved with quite a lot of national committees. The book has sold about 1000 copies and has received some lovely reviews.

The bad news is that none of the bids were successful, and none of the interest has translated into a contract for our services (yet). Legal aid fees for court work have come down another 20% and the maximum hours per case are also being squeezed. A high proportion of invoices are being queried, which generates extra work, and quite a few are not being paid at all (due to solicitors going out of business, or problems between them and the LAA, or disputes about who is responsible for the fee) as well as loads taking 12-36 months to pay. Although we have a few therapy cases, half of them are at our subsidised rate that barely covers costs. The diabetes project may be commissioned by the CCG or hospital trust at some point in the future, but there are no guarantees, and any contract definitely won’t be in place before the new financial year. Our finances were already tight, and I don’t really believe there will be a contract until it is signed off, and I can’t afford to keep the team employed until it comes through.

The CCG say that our service is too small to separate from the diabetes contract. The NHS trust made positive noises in public, but in private it was a different story. An NHS finance director told me that the trust would not consider subcontracting our service because it reduces crisis presentations that are income generating for them. That’s horrific to my thinking – that they have perverse incentives to want people to end up in diabetic comas, or with blindness, amputations or suicidality if it makes them money as an organisation. So I have to count on the service closing.

The reduction in work would mean that staffing costs will exceed our income quite substantially from January (about £5k/month) so it looks like the business has to shrink from me plus 4.5 whole time equivalent to me plus 1.6 whole time equivalent as quickly as possible, with the potential of me returning to work as a sole trader or taking up employment elsewhere in 3-4 months time if we don’t secure more work.

This is obviously gutting, and makes me feel horrendously guilty and stressed. I’ve been so upset about it that I’ve pretty much wanted to hide under my duvet and cry, rather than try to continue working. Its just horrible to feel I’ve let people down (even though I know logically that it isn’t my fault, and that I’ve always been clear with people that it is a small business and doesn’t have the safety net of the NHS, and that many of the staff were on fixed term contracts related to specific projects anyway). Of course, being self-employed I can’t just sign off sick with stress, and have to see through the court work I’m doing, but I can’t wait for some time off at xmas…

Basically, I’m having a bit of a ‘why am I doing this?’ moment, and I don’t really feel like I know what my goals are any more.

Revisiting why

I want to be a bit more candid than I was in my last blog entry. I’ve had some challenges recently in trying to run my business. So I have tried to weigh up my current path compared to the NHS. Things I loved about my NHS job were:

  • my team, as they were lovely people I could depend on to deliver the service and share a moment of (sometimes dark) humour with
  • designing, delivering and evaluating my group
  • doing complex assessments
  • doing consultation to the adoption/permanence service
  • doing consultation to the children’s homes
  • training others

You’ll note I’ve never really loved doing therapy. I’ve enjoyed it from time to time, but I much prefer shorter punchier things like assessment and consultation. Its an awful thing to say perhaps, but I don’t have the persistence for therapy, particularly with milder cases or as people get better, and I get bored unless it is a highly complex case and the first time I’ve worked with a particular issue/model. Neither do I really love supervision. Its alright, and I enjoy it if the person is bringing a lot to it, but I don’t universally look forward to it.


Things I hated about my job were:

  • pressure on throughput rather than providing a quality service
  • not being able to action anything new or innovative or to resolve problems due to the bureaucracy/lack of autonomy
  • them making promises and not delivering
  • horrible physical environment and cuts to everything that supported the clinical work (eg admin time, rooms, materials)

I can give or take being in management meetings and doing budget stuff and care pathways, it doesn’t excite me but neither is it something I dread or find soul destroying.

So I started doing more court work. Things I love about it:

  • being able to do a really in depth assessment, read the background, meet the people, write big reports, spend 50 hours on one case
  • the diversity and intensity of the cases
  • the importance of the role and weight given to your opinion
  • the chess game of the court room, and the need to be able to present your position clearly and with evidence
  • the better money

Things I hate about it:

  • heavy heavy cases full of grim content (incest, sexually abuse, non accidental injuries, violence, rape, sadistic emotional and physical abuse, chronic neglect – some of it with photos, or where I have to look at internet content that is grim)
  • increasing pressure to do it in less time, for less money and the looming prospect of a further 20% cut in fees bringing it down to below the pay rates of insurance funded therapy
  • reduced demand, so I can’t pick and choose and the cases are all at the heavy end of the spectrum
  • boom and bust demand, so I end up working 70 hour weeks to get things done on time
  • how slowly they pay (6m-24m being a typical range)
  • having to invoice and chase payments with the LAA increasingly arguing over every aspect of every bill
  • cases where there is no good solution and you have to leave kids with very disagreeable people (eg acrimonious contact disputes between unpleasant people who are still fighting with the children as pawns despite having nominally separated, or cases where the court decide the kids can stay with the parents or be placed with other relatives against your advice)

Then I’ve picked up some projects which involve researching efficacy and impact of an intervention, which I love (despite the hassle of writing bids and reports) perhaps because I do the thinking and other people do the leg work.

But to do all this stuff I’ve become a company and have premises and employ people. This is good because:

  • I like having people around so I don’t get isolated
  • I can delegate leg work to others
  • We are able to take on larger projects than I could do alone
  • I can potentially profit from work others are delivering meaning I don’t have to work as intensely myself to sustain a decent long-term income (though I feel bad writing that)

But it is frustrating because:

  • I’m paying out £150k per year on other people and premises before I earn anything
  • everyone around me is by far my junior and reliant on me for supervision and their income, so I don’t feel like I’ve got peer support or day to day challenge and conversation that I learn from (I’ve got a great peer supervisor, but we only speak once a month)
  • I’m the person whose name goes on the tin, so I want everything we do to be brilliant (this is turning me into a total control freak as everyone I employ has to to live up to my standards)
  • people have different aims and goals for what they want to get out of working for me, and it is hard to be supportive of everyone whilst also allowing myself to have a work life balance and benefit from doing this
  • it means keeping time and learning new skills to bid for projects, manage staff, balance the books and run a business

I’ve also got other responsibilities on me that I’ve chosen to take on beyond my day job; as part of the CYPF committee, editor of CFCP Review (annual journal of CYPF), committee member for the FJC/BPS group setting standards for expert witnesses, potentially writing more books, running this place. And of course outside of all that I’m a wife, a mother, a person who wants to have time to exercise, be creative, travel, read, socialise and enjoy time with my family.

I’d also had a strange point about a year ago where I realised I was older than any of my imaginings as a kid, and had no ambitions left that I hadn’t attained. Its like I had a list of things (get a job, get a consultant grade post, run a department, get married, have kids, get a nice home, etc) that are all ticked off and there isn’t anything left ahead of me to work towards.

I think the recent triggers to my angst are:
1) The first person I took on as a qualified CP to support my court work was a nice person and a good therapist but didn’t work out well. She didn’t pass her doctorate or get her HCPC during the 15 months she worked for me and thus couldn’t take any of the burden of court work off me. The parting of ways was messy and uncomfortable.
2) The AP I’d worked most closely with got onto training. He’d been brilliant at being cheerfully supportive, and I feel less prepared for each assessment without him around, and am unlikely to be able to replace him.
3) The court work has reduced in quantity and the hassle involved has increased, and I’ve been thinking a lot about what I want to bid for to keep our activities varied and ensure we have enough income to sustain the team I employ into 2014.
4) We’ve had trouble with our accountant and had to change to a new firm and now need to enter all the data into a new system (which will be great when it is done but has taken most of my best admin’s time).
5) My admin person went off long term sick for so long I had to employ someone else to replace her, and I need to tell her that I can’t have her back (which feels horrible, even though her health is not good enough to return for the foreseeable future anyway).
6) I always imagined I’d be the primary carer. But since I’ve been running the business my other half has been the one getting the kids ready for school, and collecting them at the end of the day. I always do the bedtime routine and spend time with them at weekends, but I’m not sure I’ve got my work-life balance right.

I’ve also had some health things. Nothing major, but enough to set me thinking because there really isn’t scope in the current set up for me to have any time off sick (or even for a holiday). Anyway, the net result is that today I just wanted a duvet day (give or take an appointment with the dentist which I messed up, and one with the doctor which is yet to happen) and although nothing on NHS jobs looks tempting because of the lack of autonomy and low pay, I am wondering what I really want to do from here on in.

I guess my choice is to fix it or do something different. I need to be clear which.

Working it out, slowly

The offices are suiting us well, but are now bursting at the seams on some days. We’ve done a mountain of court work over the last six months, and I’ve never worked so hard in my life! I’ve even done some work for the High Courts and Royal Courts in London. The team is currently me, a nearly-qualified CP, 3 APs, a part-time admin (currently off to recover from surgery), a part-time admin (who is covering the absence, but will stay on as my PA), a part time operational manager, a part-time CBT therapist, and we’ve got two interns for the summer. The nearly qualified CP is leaving, ironically just before gaining the HCPC registration we’ve been waiting 16 months for, so we have a job advert out to recruit a replacement. I really need a second in command that I can delegate to, as we’ve got lots going on.

The research project is going well, and we are bidding for related projects, both in paediatrics and in supporting patients with long-term conditions at the hospital, as well as related to adoption and Looked After Children. We are being commissioned to do therapy by Local Authorities in relation to LAC, have had enquiries from schools about using their personal budgets, and get a regular supply of self-referred private clients. We’ve got the small grants to do groups for pregnant and new mums, and various requests for training, as well as several agencies considering whether to commission consultation packages. My book seems to have done well enough for the publishers to be keen for me to write more, and my involvement in the BPS has continued to grow, along with my contribution to the political wrangling about legal aid cuts and the use of expert witnesses. And we’ve done some interesting research too, with an article accepted for CP Forum, presentations at various conferences, and various other publications on the way.

It has felt quite pressured to keep sufficient cash-flow to pay all the staff, because our running costs are now much higher (£15k/month) whilst there are still delays in being paid, particularly for legally aided work, and the grant is paid in arrears. As a result I’ve taken no income from the business at all for the past year, apart from minimum wage, which didn’t even cover my tax bill (which was unusually high as I had to declare all unpaid invoices from my self-employment in the same tax year as my NHS salary and redundancy payment went through). From that I’ve had to pay enormous nursery fees, so its been a tough year for me financially – probably more touch and go than I’ve let the team know, as I’ve had to borrow money personally to support the business. Nonetheless the accountant tells me if I get on top of the invoicing then the business should be on a solid footing in the longer term (and my kids start school in September, so my childcare costs will disappear, easing my personal finances).

At times the financial strain means I have wondered about jobs with regular salaries and less responsibility for others, but I love the autonomy and flexibility that running my own business offers. Even an 8D Head of Child Psychology in a really pretty part of the country hasn’t turned my head enough to apply. I think its the pressure of throughput, the lack of scope to be creative and the bureaucracy in the NHS at the moment that puts me off, along with fixed hours, commuting, paying for parking and trivial stuff like that. I love that I have created something from nothing, and that others are recognising the quality of my brand. I think it is quite telling that we have had to turn work away in a time when others are reporting struggling to find sufficient court work. I also love having my own team of people that I’ve selected and really get on with, rather than the NHS way of being stuck with what you’ve got (and not being able to get rid of anyone). The people I have chosen all work hard, believe in what we are doing and are amazingly supportive. They even made me a salted caramel cake for my birthday!

I’ve just started some management coaching, to focus on that side of my professional development. I’ve set the goals of getting on top of the money and getting a better work life balance. Whether it was that conversation or reaching a point I could not avoid any longer, I’ve finally conquered the invoices I’ve been moaning about for 6 months! I’ve compared all the work we’ve done to all the invoices issued, and then (with the help of my team) made up invoices for all the work that has been completed to date. I’ve also joined the Federation of Small Businesses. And I’m about to take nearly a fortnight off work with my kids, despite having already had two weeks off this year. This might not sound a lot but I took only 5 days off in total during 2012, so this is much healthier!

Finding my own way forward

It feels like so much has changed even over the last five months since I last posted.

We moved into the new offices, furnished them and got fibre-optic broadband and unlimited phone calls. We’ve got a lovely therapy room, a reception, a kitchenette, a loo, an office where most of the team sit, and my office which can be used for consultations and appointments when the other room is busy. This suits us so much better than being in a giant serviced office building as the space is ours alone. There is something quite remarkable about being able to do things immediately and autonomously when compared to how long each process would take in the NHS.

The team now consists of me, a part-time operational manager, a full time nearly-CP (just needs to get thesis corrections signed off and HCPC registration), an AP, an AP(R), a general assistant (psychology graduate), a part-time admin (the full-time one didn’t work out), and a part-time CBT therapist who contributes to one project. We are recruiting again, as demand still exceeds supply, and hope to get someone (or two) to join us from a clinical course as they qualify in September. It feels like we are on a path of steady growth, but it is actually quite tricky to ensure that we balance workforce and work. I’m learning a lot more about running a business, and also learning to delegate to my team. We have set up a social enterprise company* to split off the provision of therapy and certain other projects from the court-work focused limited company. We have a new local accountant helping us get our more complex books in order.

The research aspect has also really taken off. We have won a Health Foundation Shine award, which gives us £75k to offer and evaluate a psychological therapy service to aid treatment adherence for diabetes patients at the local hospital and a small parish council grant to run and evaluate a group for expectant mothers and a perinatal group. There is potential to expand the hospital pilot to other areas over the next year. We are also going to apply for an ESRC grant in collaboration with a local university. We’ve formed connections with lots of the voluntary and community organisations in our local area, and have put in some small grant applications for various projects. We’ve also got talks going on with various social care and health organisations about delivering consultancy, assessment and therapy services, and enquiries about many other things we have mentioned. We’ve had a few therapy referrals from various different sources, including some self-funded private clients, and are (frustratingly slowly) becoming registered as a provider for one of the major health insurers. The court work continues to flow in as our main income too, with ever more complex and interesting cases, so it feels like I need to be careful we don’t grow in too many directions at once, and focus on the interface between our passion, our expertise and what is marketable.

Meanwhile I’ve got my book coming out next month which hardly feels real! We are planning to have a launch event of the new social enterprise coupled with a book launch on 1st March and do some free talks for various groups of professionals at a local venue, which should be fun. The publishers are keen for this to be the first of a series, but I need to carefully consider what (if anything) to write next. I’m toying with the idea of writing up some papers and a book (and perhaps even a phd) on an area of research that’s been particularly interesting to me, but it rests on getting another grant and/or some paid academic sessions and deciding this is worth the time commitment compared to other projects. I’ve also joined the committee of the BPS faculty for children, young people and their families, and the FJC/BPS reference group for psychologists as expert witnesses as well as my on-going role with CPLAAC. Its probably a bit much all at once whilst running two companies, but I value each role for different reasons. It has also brought me into contact with a new peer supervisor, which is great.

Most important of all, I’m still enjoying it! I’ve built a fantastic team of people who I enjoy working with each day, and I’m working with the issues that are of most interest to me, and I’m keeping a balance of activities but all with a focus on quality. It turns out that CP skills are quite marketable, if you are creative about it and have a good reputation and network. Although I’m still weak at the financial side (invoicing, chasing late payments, keeping good records of expenses to put on tax returns, etc) I hope this will be a mountain I conquer this month, with a one-off blitz and then keep under control by devising ways to delegate aspects of this to others in the team. We still seem to be ticking over though.

My other aim for this year is to get a clearer vision of our destination, or at least our direction of travel, and then think about the company structure that will be necessary to achieve that vision. I’m quite obsessional about the business to the point of being a bit of a control freak, and so I find it hard to delegate and not to be involved with everything, but this will be necessary as we grow. I think this will get easier as the experience of the team grows and I test out what other people can do well without me. Hopefully this will allow me to have a better work life balance, where I can fit in more time for leisure, exercise, relaxation and sleep – not just work and the kids!


*A social enterprise is a company that is run for the purposes of doing good. So either it can be a normal business that donates the majority of its profits to a good cause, or it can be a business that does something worthwhile where the majority of the profit is reinvested in delivering that work.